Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. second was using prof 5. just ran a 3rd with profile 5 to write the results down. 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* D: @Sammus: what about the Powertune settings? – added Preset:2160 scores. Temperature was 78°. CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor Sounds quite low to me . drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 The top model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to achieve first (Home Score) or second place (Work Score… Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti CPU speed: 3400 MHz GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box). Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Welcome to the Geekbench CUDA Benchmark Chart. Frames 2250 Peak temp: 94°C ASUS P8Z77-VLK Max GPU Temp: 90°C In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). temperature 57°C. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms) Backstory: I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. Score 264. temps seem to be really good and runs WoW very smooth. I suggest you do the same if you want a direct comparison. Graphics drivers: Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p Memory clock: 1500 MHz System Info 700W FSP Aurum PSU Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. Testing furmark … Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) See this article for details on powertune. festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900. Its pretty strange. FurMark 1.22.0.0 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz What are your thoughts? 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. – Radeon RX 470, Update: 2014.11.10 FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) Or passmark’s performance test 9? So what’s the formula here my man. I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. Catalyst 13.2 GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, System Info: Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling CPU speed: 3499 MHz Update drivers etc too. I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples, FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189), Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C I cant test under 1080. Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Максимальная температура 66 ° C Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 But this is my first pascal card. ??? The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. GPU clock: 1005 MHz MSAA: 0x. Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 Might help. Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg – MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G, Update: 2014.09.24 I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C CPU: 4616 MHz In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. Catalyst 13.1 3900 MHz/16337 MB (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). I let the test run for an hour. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. System Memory |2046MB ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. Graphics score looks fine. Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz. MSAA samples: 0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 I logged everything through Corsair Link (intervals of 60s). It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. @ 2xAA Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. 1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX BTW, am using v1.10.0. bench duration:15min 63Deg C. 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. Preset:1080 @ 1920×1080 – Radeon RX 5500 XT If any of that might affect results, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098 i should be 2nd on list 3600points for radeon 7950, @Andrew try setting your graphics Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase Too hot? 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess. CPU Speed 2395 MHz 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. – Radeon RX Vega 64. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz) Max GPU Temp: 0°C Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° Running the 1920×1080 on my HD 6670 gave me a whopping 531 pts (4891 frames, 5FPS, 62°C). This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. 4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz. Who’s laughing now. GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz Memory clock: 3004 MHz You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). clocks not available CPU: 3013 MHz Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. MSAA samples: 0 , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 amd a4 5300 3.4ghz cpu, as stated the cpu is NOT overclocked and last reported running at 3.67, 3.37* as 3.67 would be clocked. GPU clock: 1019 MHz OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c How about TimeSpy? http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz GPU core: 1380MHz Jerome, somethings wrong here. FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2 Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) But then again, I'm not one of the smart folks who know all about troubleshooting. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz The max. Discussion. Max GPU Temp: 80°C FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset. Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above, http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg. Average 38fps. Oops, my bad. But this is my first pascal card. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? Why is there no 6850 listed? Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. Preset:1080 MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) Its not adding up. Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples Dynamic background Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… MSI’s GTX 1050 Ti comes with three modes for the GPU clock speeds: Silent mode (base: 1290MHz, boost: 1392MHz), Gaming mode (base: 1303MHz, boost: 1417MHz) and OC mode(base: 1316MHz, boost: 1430MHz). Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. system memory:8172 MB Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Memory clock: 1500 MHz This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? Update: 2016.08.25 ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time. Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656). Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. max fps in full HD: ~43 92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C MSAA samples: 0 Is that bad if so what could be causing this? 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples FYI Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562, 3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. GPU mem: 1800MHz 72 degrees C The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg 9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . @ 1920×1080 That’s crazy, is that even possible? CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 2046 MB The GeForce GTX 1070 is a performance-segment graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in June 2016. Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz thanks in advance! system memory:16324 MB Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) GeForce GTX 465 Windows XP 32 Bit Bench duration: 15min 7850 System Memory: 16330 MB CPU speed: 3403 MHz Duration: 5min Preset:1080 Fan: 75%. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 4gb DDR3 ram. Tested more than twice. Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3 I got an intel core i5 4460 3,2GHz, asrock h97 anniversary mobo, 240gb samsung evo 850 ssd (Win10 inside), gtx 1070 palit 8GB, hyperx ddr3 8 gb RAM, 1TB HDD. FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. 3500 MHz 16289 MB Who’s laughing now. and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. Overclock it? GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. MSAA samples: 0 CPU Speed: 3510MHz From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. ok. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. I get a failure when I try to Submit results. Results: I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. 1080p 59Deg C. should mention OS win8 64 bit скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. is that right? Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. 13190 frames, 14 FPS GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? Th… AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) 3125 MHz GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. GPU clock: 1050 MHz I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg – GeForce GTX TITAN Memory clock: 3004 MHz 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) Temp at 100% 66c Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. That would mean I’m beating a 680! I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. 34°C ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points FX 8120 @ 4ghz Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Treiber: 9.18.13.2680 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. 13FPS and 836 score. 1080p, 7970 x1 Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. Burn-in , 3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good. Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. There’s a headline all over a week ago. My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! Hope this helps in some way. I should also mention, How come 5+3/2=2 eh? GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). Isnt that a little low for my rig? I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. This means that the […] Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C Window mode: fullscreen I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64